On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, George W. Hart wrote:
> For a better test, you could rotate each ball a random amount, scale it
> slightly differently, and perturb its position a small random distance.
> Then each intersection will be a slightly different problem for the
> software to solve. In that case, I suspect there is a good chance that
> at least one of them will expose a software problem. (But I would be
> happy to hear otherwise...)
Amen to that.
I've just been compiling an open source Linux package, GTS, that seems
to have a fairly robust set of mesh boolean operations. I got it from
sourceforge.net. I haven't tried anything very difficult yet, and I
don't know how its algorithms stack up to those of Magics and whatnot,
but it's one more tool -- and you can't beat the price.
-Sheba
-- Bathsheba Grossman phone (831)429-8224, fax (831)460-1242 Sculpting geometry bathsheba.com Solidscape prototyping protoshape.com Protein crystals crystalprotein.comReceived on Wed Jan 21 22:56:39 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 12 2010 - 19:37:11 EET