Re: [rp-ml] Reports of the Death of the RPML have been greatly exaggerated...

From: Adrian Bowyer (
Date: Thu Jun 28 2007 - 12:08:55 EEST

Greg Pettengill wrote:

> You are much too modest! As it appears to me now, it would be better to
> have an interested commercial entity running the list rather than a
> disinterested non-commercial entity. I believe the RPML could elect a
> Board of Directors from its subscribers to make its policy decisions.
> If such a board were to exist, why wouldn't a commercial entity be
> acceptable to carry on the day-to-day upkeep?

It is clearly important that those running RPML should be disinterested
but not uninterested.

Best wishes
Dr Adrian Bowyer

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 18:13:05 EET