I just saw photos of jewelry models made on a Thermo-Jet that look really
rough. I am sure that it would take quite a bit of work to get them cleaned
up. The Solidscape ( Sanders Prototype ) MMII also leaves a generally
unsuitable surface finish for a jewelry master model as well. Both of these
machines are great...to a point. If you are willing to put in the extra man
hours in post processing and can tolerate the inherent imperfections that
the human processes create.
The accuracy of my RTM system creates a superior surface finish that can be
invested and/or molded with little or no clean up. The models that I produce
might cost a little more up front but, I am sure that it saves hours of hand
labor that costs too that are rarely calculated.
As for methods, may I suggest also that you try the following materials for
clean up as well
bronze wool ( never steel )
nylon stockings ( great light abrasive )
Glazing technique using a Wax Pen with a small wire insert
Steven Adler CEO
Automated 3D Modeling
----- Original Message -----
From: "SiderWhite" <email@example.com>
To: "Rapid Prototype Mailing List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:28 PM
Subject: Summary of ThermoJet wax removal products
> Thanks again rp-ml!
> I've summarized the responses I've received for everybody's benefit.
> ThermoJet Wax removal tip summary:
> 1. I assume you are referring to removal of the rough surface left by the
> supports. Have you tried a little bit of Johnson's paste wax on a
> Scotchbrite pad?
> 2. Johnson's Paste Wax smoothes out the surface.
> 3. 3DSystems recommends Orange Clean Supper Concentrate
> http://www.greatcleaners.com> to clean parts up after supports have been
> knocked off. We use a similar product called Citrol from National Chemical
> Laboratories, Inc. (1-800-Nat-Chem) It seems to be a little stronger and
> works well on parts and floors that have had support material ground into
> Note: this seems like a good lead to follow - also there's that cleaner
> called "Orange-Glo" which has been on a lot of infomercials lately.
> 4. I am a reseller for The Thermojet. Recently I worked on waxes to be
> as samples for several jewelry trade shows. I found that "Wax Kleen,"a
> Product, made by B.Jadow and Sons, Inc., works very well. It is 100%
> I also used xylene solvent also worked very well but, was a little more
> aggressive and it is a solvent of questionable carcinogenic properties. I
> also used a rotary file from Matt Wax (Adolfo Mattiello) that did not
> clog, as most wax paddles or rotary files do. I found not only can a
> Thermojet do parts a Sanders MM2 can't do, it can do them 40 to 50 times
> faster, with
> a 10 minute clean up (352 jets as apposed to 2). A part could be in
> production (built, cast the master, finished, rubber mold, cast for
> production) before a Sanders could build one part. I had to experience it
> myself, before I would comment on this. I admit some parts are better
> executed on the Sanders, but I saw parts that a Sanders could not build.
> This was with up facing surfaces,and lettering and thin parts (usually
> dissolved in the support layer
> removal on the Sanders). I have used both and as performs in my industry,
> feel it's a outstanding output device. I am partial to CNC Mills, but
> me. I
> hope that this helps, beside Wax Kleen smells of Oranges, cool stuff
> (available through jewelry tool suppliers). Have Fun!!
> 5. 3D Systems has desribed a "citrus" degreaser, often sold by bike
> to remove chain residue. I have never tried it, we use unfriendly
> for this.
> 6. Have you tried the "All Citrus" Cleaner/Degreaser from Stoner? I used
> before I came to work for 3D and continue to this day.
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
Steven Adler CEO
Automated 3D Modeling
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jan 04 2002 - 09:56:46 EET