I did an accuracy study more than a year ago. I had planned to publish the
results, but since it appears this will not happen, I have uploaded the study to
PML's web site. You can view it at
As you can see from my results, none of the parts were within a GA of nominal. :)
Alain BERNARD wrote:
> Dear RP colleagues,
> I am also interested in all comparison points, selection criteria between
> RP technologies and rapid product development processes.
> If any ideas on these topics, please let me know !
> At this time, I am working on a CAPP system for rapid prototyping. I am
> also working on the design of a (different ?) reference part(s) in order to
> qualify RP processes. In parallel, my students are developping a CAPP
> system (simulation, validation, automatic generation of positions and
> paths) for 3D laser scanning in order to be able to facilitate and
> standardize the measurement of 3D complexe parts produced using RP processes.
> Thank you for your replies.
> Best Regards,
> Prof. A. BERNARD
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
-- Steve Farentinos PML, Inc. 201 W. Beach Ave. Inglewood, CA 90302 310 671-4345 310 671-0858 FAX email@example.com
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:50:54 EEST