M. Burns (email@example.com) wrote:
> I am confused by the question that was posed about converting GIF
> and JPEG to wireframes, and by the answers. I must be missing something
> here. I thought GIF and JPEG were 2-D formats, while a wireframe is
> necessarily 3-D, so that a conversion would not make much sense. Can
> somebody please straighten me out on this?
"Heightfield" is a key term here. The idea is that you can assign different
depths to light and drak areas in a raster image. There are applications of
this that are very sophisticated. 4 in stance, Stereoplotting, where aerial
stereo-photographs are used as the database to make contour maps.
This is different than "Digitized" data for reverse engineering. It is
gathered by a co-ordinate measurement device. This yields "hard" data as
opposed to "soft" data that would need to be interperted in some way.
This is very related to robotic vision stuff...
-- Greg Pettengill http://www.indirect.com/www/greg_p/index.html I do not know if it is true, but I imagine that there are scientists who, by following the paths of the so-called "cold" intellect -possibly without being aware of it- are plumbing the depths of a mystery rather than searching for the solution to a problem... M.C. Escher
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:37:17 EEST