RE: [rp-ml] Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

From: McCauley, Patrick <mccauley_at_centerbrook.com>
Date: Fri May 11 2012 - 17:40:33 EEST

I generally agree with Jeremy, not really so awesome.

 

That said, the point is that the piece was not supposed to be beautifully made, commissioned model of Fenway.

It was merely a promotional piece by Objet.

They used an iconic place to highlight Objet (noted by the huge logo on the model) in particular and “whatever that new process” is called in general.

At least that is what it seemed like to me.

 

Pretty impressive to the pedestrian on Landsdowne, not so much for us insiders.

 

I thoroughly enjoyed the trans-Atlantic banter.

 

Best,

 

Patrick

 

 

Patrick McCauley
Master Model Maker/Product Designer
 
Centerbrook Architects & Planners, LLP
67 Main Street, PO Box 955
Centerbrook, CT 06409
 
860.767.0175 860.581.2704 direct
mccauley@centerbrook.com

Visit our website at www.centerbrook.com. <http://www.centerbrook.com/>



From: owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi [mailto:owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pullin
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 2:55 AM
To: Chathamres; rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi
Subject: RE: [rp-ml] Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

 

I love my iced tea nice and cold old chap but if the menu said that it was a lovely piping hot cup of tea and it was served ice cold the I wouldn’t just sit there at the table and say this is a new revolution in the world of hot tea serving and will change tea forever and then launch a consultancy describing to everybody how tea drinking will never be the same again and that hot tea will now be made obsolete due to the development of environmentally friendly ice. I’d just say “excuse me my tea is cold but I ordered and wanted hot”.

 

In all seriousness I am a huge fan of 3D printing or additive manufacturing or whatever we are calling it today but like anything else it, is at its most powerful and most impressive when used in the right way for the right application and as an application this really would have been so much better done another way.

 

 

Jez.

 

 

From: Chathamres [mailto:chathamres@aol.com]
Sent: 10 May 2012 14:51
To: Jeremy Pullin; rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi
Subject: Re: [rp-ml] Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

 

To be strictly correct, we should have put the title in quotes, since the article it was taken from stated it that way.

 

To get a calibration on your opinions, we are thinking that you are the kind of person who complains about his iced tea being too cold!!

Chathamres
chathamres@aol.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Pullin <Jeremy.Pullin@Renishaw.com>
To: Chathamres <chathamres@aol.com>; rp-ml <rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi>
Sent: Thu, May 10, 2012 8:04 am
Subject: RE: [rp-ml] Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

Depends what you mean by Awesome! If you mean in terms of geometry complexity then it’s ok but I guess that everybody on this list has seen better but if you mean in terms of the use of 3D printing (or rather additive manufacturing) then it’s absolutely bloody awful and is a powerful example of the weaknesses of the technology and its use.

 

Just by rough calculations you are looking at a material spend of around £36,000 ($58,000 or €45,000) and material spend is obviously far less than the cost of modelling it all up in CAD (and to be fair it looks as though somebody has done a fantastic job of doing that). You then have to add on the time and costs of doing the builds, post processing the parts and putting it all together and after all that you end up with something plain white lacking texture and plastic.

 

Now I dare say that it is a good re-creation of the place and that the model is a nice size and holds a special place in the hearts of all the people who have gone to watch rounders being played there over the years but the reason that it is a terrible example of 3D printing (AM) is because it shouldn’t have been made this way. In some applications 3D printing is a stunning technology but it’s all a matter of relative merits and in this case it has to be compared to model making. The model could have been produced by a model maker much much faster because he or she would not have had to spend months converting blueprints into 3D CAD. The model maker would have produced something textured and coloured and just plain better for a fraction of the cost. When you regard 3D printing from this perspective and in this context using this example it just shows up its flaws and makes it look slower, more expensive with an inferior output.

 

So all in all no it is not an awesome example of 3D printing just an exceptionally bad one.

 

Jeremy Pullin.

 

From: owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi <mailto:owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi> [mailto:owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi <mailto:owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi?> ] On Behalf Of Chathamres
Sent: 09 May 2012 16:10
To: rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi <mailto:rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi>
Subject: [rp-ml] Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

 

Awesome Example of 3D Printing

Chathamres
chathamres@aol.com <mailto:chathamres@aol.com>

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chatham Research <chathamres@aol.com <mailto:chathamres@aol.com> >
To: chathamres <chathamres@aol.com <mailto:chathamres@aol.com> >
Sent: Wed, May 9, 2012 11:07 am
Subject: Fwd: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing



Sent from my iPad


Begin forwarded message:

        Subject: This Intricate Replica of Fenway Park Is an Awesome Example of 3D Printing

        http://gizmodo.com/5908723/this-intricate-replica-of-fenway-park-is-an-awesome-example-of-3d-printing <http://gizmodo.com/5908723/this-intricate-replica-of-fenway-park-is-an-awesome-example-of-3d-printing>
        
        
        Sent from my iPad

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments are confidential and are for the use of the
addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you must not use or disclose the
contents to any other person. Please immediately notify the sender and
delete the email. Statements and opinions expressed here may not
represent those of the company. Email correspondence is monitored by
the company. This information may be subject to export control
regulation. You are obliged to comply with such regulations.

Renishaw plc (company number 1106260), Wotton Travel Limited (company
number 01973158) and Renishaw Advanced Materials Limited (company number 04632041),
are companies registered in England and Wales with a registered office
at New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR,
United Kingdom, Telephone +44 1453 524524.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Fri May 11 17:43:08 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 29 2013 - 15:24:46 EET