From: manak lal jain (manaklj@rediffmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2007 - 08:15:26 EET
Hello,
The same case happening with me also since last 6 month.
I observed about 90% of rp-mail is going in my spam folder but I made a regualr habit to see my spam folder.
This is for information only.
With best wishes,
Dr. M. L. Jain
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 EdGrenda@aol.com wrote :
>
>In a message dated 11/14/2007 9:06:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>sachsg@sbcglobal.net writes:
>
>I noticed this happening several months ago, but never got around to asking
>if others have had this problem. It seems that (with Yahoo mail at least)
>quite a few postings to rp-ml (but not all) get put into my spam folder and then
>I have to take them out and indicate that they are not really spam. I don't
>know if anyone else has had this problem, but if so, it could be preventing
>many messages from getting through to subscribers and maybe this has even led
>to the apparent drop in postings and responses (but then I guess if ALL rp-ml
>messages are somehow going into your spam folder, you won't get this message
>either). So if you haven't already - maybe you should check that spam folder
>once in a while. I'd be interested in learning if a lot of you are having
>this happen.
>
>G. Sachs
>
>
>
>
>Hi George:
>
>Once in a while - especially for certain writers - the machinery here using
>2 different ISP's will throw something into the trash. Not a problem because
>I've always been the kind of person that likes to rummage through dumps
>anyway, and this is just another manifestation.
>
>I'm afraid the problem with fewer messages is fewer messages, and probably
>considerably lower list membership, as well. That can no longer be checked
>publicly (function disabled last time I looked), but I see it reflected in
>aspects of my work, as well.
>
>We're seeing some level of maturity and many of the original tweety birds
>have had their curiosity satisfied or became disaffected long ago. Nowadays we
>generally know what the state of the art is and what can be accomplished with
>existing technology. There are also now some clear winners and losers as
>well as entrenched interests, which also tend to squelch the conversation.
>
>Applications continue to expand, but I think it will be a new crowd and
>they're either not here or not quite up to speed yet. If the problems of price,
>ease of use, accuracy, speed and materials continue to be improved this will
>be the lull before the storm.
>
>Storms are quite unpredictable when they're still a ways off, though.
>
>
>Ed Grenda
>Castle Island Co.
>_EdGrenda@aol.com_ (mailto:EdGrenda@aol.com) (email)
>
>The Worldwide Guide to Rapid Prototyping
>http://home.att.net/~castleisland/
>
>
>
>************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 18:13:09 EET