From: Adrian Bowyer (A.Bowyer@bath.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 24 2005 - 14:23:05 EET
John Walmsley wrote:
> */I agree that if a machine was building copies of itself, the
> accuracy could be a problem, but I think that most of the parts would be
> within a specified tolerance, since in theory more parts would fall
> within a bell-curve than at the ends, no? Therefore we should get mostly
> usable parts./*
> *//*
> */I suppose we should have a separate machine to do QC, huh? ;-)/*
Much more fun is to have the machine make its own re-cycler, so it can use old
broken or out-of-tol parts to make new ones...
Yours
Adrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Jan 02 2006 - 08:09:08 EET