tell you what, if I get about 100 more of these notes, I'll put you ON my
mailing list.
TH
----- Original Message -----
From: <cculp@beckman.com>
To: Nick Osborn <Nick.Osborn@swiftech.co.uk>
Cc: <mmayes@harvest-tech.com>; <owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi>;
<rclemons@harvest-tech.com>; <rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Another Mission Impossible
>
> Please take me off your mailing list. I do not know why I am getting your
> email.
> I am sure this is in error.
>
> Carol Culp
> Beckman Coulter, U.S.
>
>
>
> "Nick Osborn"
> <Nick.Osborn@swift To: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi,
rclemons@harvest-tech.com
> ech.co.uk> cc:
mmayes@harvest-tech.com
> Sent by: Subject: Re: Another
Mission Impossible
> owner-rp-ml@ltk.hu
> t.fi
>
>
> 06/06/2001 04:10
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ron
>
> Do you have STLs available?
>
> If so we can Moldflow them (for free) with your required production gate
> position and quote you for Swiftool moulds to run a batch of parts off.
> Cost & delivery is roughly equivalent to vac. casting, but you get real
> injection moulded parts, made on industry standard Boy injection moulding
> machines, using production packing, clamp and injection pressures.
>
> The only real variable from a conventional production tool is cooling time
> between shots (NOT solidification times of the molten plastic in the
> mould).
>
> Master pattern would be small spot SLA or machined metal master if
> necessary.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> Nick
>
>
> Nick Osborn
> Managing Director
> Swift Technologies Limited
> Tel: +44 (0) 1354 650 789
> www.swiftech.co.uk
>
> "Real Parts Real Quick - Because Time is Money"
>
> >>> "Ron Clemons" <rclemons@harvest-tech.com> 05/06/01 19:58:48 >>>
> I'm sure every bureau gets their share of these, but.....I have a customer
> who needs some "choice plastic" protos, with very small detail for
> functional testing, and of course they don't want to spend a lot of money!
> Therefore, tooling/molding and fine-detail machining come to mind first.
> The standard RP methods have been ruled out because the teeth need to be
> fully filled and the strength requirements exceed the capabilities of the
> RP stuff. The customer is having low cost tooling done overseas, but
wants
> some parts beforehand for testing. Any realistic realistic suggestions
are
> welcomed.
>
> "Ring Part"
> * outer dims: 1.30"D x .180"H
> * teeth: on top of ring, .046" base, .034" from base to apex
> * ribs: .29" base x .009" apex
> * material: nylon 6
>
> "Tubular Part"
> * outer dims: 1.135"D x 4.913L
> * has threads on one end on the OD
> * material ABS
>
> Ron Clemons
> Harvest Technologies
> "Where Innovation Takes Shape"
>
>
>
>
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jan 04 2002 - 09:57:23 EET