Re: Proposals

From: Nick Osborn (Nick.Osborn@swiftech.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2000 - 12:42:44 EEST


Dear Ed

If such a facility were to be made available then I for one believe it would be an excellent start to solving this particular problem of making the wealth of archive material more easily accessible .

On a related note, in addition to a standard benchmark part for RP machines (or maybe a range of 2 -3 parts to show the different strengths / weaknesses of the different RP systems?) how about a standard benchmark Rapid Tool to achieve the same aim but for the various Rapid Tooling Systems available?

We are currently doing a number of benchmark tests with customers who are doing this themselves in isolation - surely it makes more sense for the industry to agree on a 1 - 3 examples which give everyone a chance to show where their technology fits best?

P.S. Keep up the good work, Elaine - it is greatly appreciated

Regards

Nick

Nick Osborn
Managing Director
STL
Tel: +44 (0) 1354 650 789
www.swiftech.co.uk

"Real Parts Real Quick - Because Time is Money"

>>> <EdGrenda@aol.com> 01/06/00 18:24:02 >>>

If ENTHUSIASM is demonstrated, you all might be able to have this stuff next
week.

Ed Grenda
Castle Island Co.
19 Pondview Road
Arlington, MA 02474 USA
781-646-6280 (voice or fax)
EdGrenda@aol.com (email)
http://home.att.net/~castleisland/

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:03:36 EEST