I guess I am a little late to this party....
Bill is ont the money here. Cable access=much higher than xDSL access and
as he has noted, unless you are right on top of the local node, forget about
it.
Note that access degrades as more users are on line but how many people on
your block are going to be downloading those 200MB assemblies t the same time?
The most important note however is security related. Unlike xDSL or a dial
up connection, cable access is a <public> NETWORK connection.
Additionally, your upload rate is not as fast as downloading, and overall
rates vary on the service provider, 'cable modem' .
All in all though, it's da bomb.
With best regards,
Ron Ptaszek
P&R Precision, Inc.
50495 Corporate Drive
Shelby Township, MI 48315
TEL: 810-254-6720
FAX: 810-254-0638
**************************************************
Prototype and Production Injection Molds direct from your Pro
or other Database with fast, reliable deliveries backed by 14 years
of CAD/CAM Experience and 45+ Years Tooling Expertise
**************************************************
In a message dated 11/30/99 7:33:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, wdr@virtcon.com
writes:
<< Subj: Re: Off topic - Internet connection speeds
Date: 11/30/99 7:33:53 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: wdr@virtcon.com (William D. Richards)
Sender: owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi
To: KDenton@williams-int.com
CC: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
At 4:20 PM -0500 1999/11/30, KDenton@williams-int.com wrote:
>Have any of you hooked up to the Internet using ASDL?
>
>How is it? Are you satisfied?
>
>Karl Denton
>
>For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
Karl,
ADSL is alright, but there are limitations to it, the greatest being
the fact that if there are more than 4 miles of phone lines between
you and the switching station, you can't get any type of DSL service.
Also, distance will severely limit the actual bandwidth you can get
out of DSL. Basically, unless the switching station is right next
door to you, forget about reaping the benefits of any of the
different types of xDSL service.
Second, the price of DSL service is not competitive. Prices generally
start at $80 per month on the average for the slowest bandwidth of
DSL, and rapidly climb from there. Compare that price to cable modem
access at $35 to $50 per month.
Third, speed. DSL is not as fast at cable modem. Period. I read a
terrific article comparing the two, and much to my enormous surprise,
cable came out significantly on top over DSL. For most users --
unless you live on the same block as the switching station -- the
best speed you can get out of DSL is roughly twice as fast as ISDN.
The promise of DSL is still there. It sounds really great to be able
to use existing phone lines in your home or establishment to get this
type of service. But the hardware infrastructure needed to support
this potential is not there. It will probably have to wait until the
telephone companies can deliver fiber-optic cable to the private
home, just at the cable television companies are doing right now.
You still have to connect a router for both services, cable and xDSL,
and xDSL is easier because you can park it next to any telephone
jack. With cable, you will first have to string a co-axial cable to
the router (aka "cable modem"). With both, once you have connected
the router, you must run an ethernet cable from it to your computer's
ethernet port.
To conclude, Karl, I would recommend you get cable modem service. It
is cheaper, and more likely to be available to you than xDSL. Bear in
mind, if you don't have cable access, then it's a good bet that you
won't have any type of xDSL service.
I will see if I can't find a reference to that article.
Bill Richards
._____________________________________________________.
/| Virtual Concepts Design ...Where the Virtual |
| | Becomes REAL! |
| | 696 Paine Rd. |
| | North Attleborough, MA 02760 |
| | Phone/Fax:(508) 695-0534 |
| | e-mail: wdr@virtcon.com http://www.virtcon.com |
| !_____________________________________________________!
|/_____________________________________________________/
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi>
Received: from rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3])
by air-yb03.mail.aol.com (vx) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:33:53 -0500
Received: from bart.lpt.fi (bart.lpt.fi [193.166.66.1]) by
rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (v65.4) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:33:22 1900
Received: from major by bart.lpt.fi with local (Exim 1.90 #2)
for rp-ml-outgoing@bart.lpt.fi
id 11sxG7-00001d-00; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 00:04:35 +0000
Received: from neelix.ici.net ([207.180.0.25])
by bart.lpt.fi with esmtp (Exim 1.90 #2)
for rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
id 11sxG6-0007SJ-00; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 02:04:34 +0200
Received: (from virtcon@localhost)
by neelix.ici.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA15359;
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:06:51 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: virtcon@pop.virtcon.com
Message-Id: <v04220808b469f57d31ea@[207.180.42.104]>
In-Reply-To:
<551AEBFEC053D211B912000083947AE01FDB44@mailsrv.williams-int.com>
References:
<551AEBFEC053D211B912000083947AE01FDB44@mailsrv.williams-int.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:03:13 -0500
To: KDenton@williams-int.com
From: "William D. Richards" <wdr@virtcon.com>
Subject: Re: Off topic - Internet connection speeds
Cc: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi
Precedence: bulk
>>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:53:41 EEST