Re: STL Replacement

From: Todd Smith (todd@solidconcepts.com)
Date: Sat Nov 13 1999 - 00:50:26 EET


On Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:13:05 -0500, you wrote:

You have 2 problems to difficult problems to solve.

1. You need a better file format. Native would be the best with STEP
coming in second.

2. You need a good CAD design. There's nothing to prevent a CAD
desinger from making an unbuildable part. So you either have to
educate the CAD designers or you have to have some advanced healing
software than can fix bad designs.

>> Dear List,
>>
>> AAROFLEX, Inc. operation continues to see, on occasion, flaws in STL
>> files that produce some undesirable results. Usually, this occurs on a
>> most crucial part to be fabricated. Of course, there are software
>> packages to clean up the bad files, but this is time consuming and
>> costly of which no is willing to pay or appreciate this extra work.
>> This is a big hindrance to the growth of the industry in the day of
>> automation. Therefore, this firm will be most happy to consider a new
>> file format for the AAROFLEX Solid Imager. Just imagine having a simple
>> file conversion to this new format that is more accurate, smaller file
>> size, faster to manipulate, color sensitive, depth exposure sensitive
>> and possess a step function to determine optimal layer thickness as well
>> as print through. The software should be able to convert most 3D CAD
>> files and be accompanied with a fast slicing algorithm. This appears to
>> be very doable.
>>
>> Well, What do you think?
>>
>> Albert C. Young
>> AAROFLEX, Inc.

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:53:26 EEST