Re: Ambiguous Measurement Terminology

From: Kitty Seerden (kitty.seerden@materials.oxford.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 01 1999 - 17:35:08 EET


Normally I would stick to the metrical system...
but I make an exception for the GA units,
Must have been an interesting study....

Kitty

>I have noticed that went RP people talk about measurements in mils,
>there can be a great deal of confusion. The problem comes about,
>because depending on the background of the person, this can mean
>millimeters or thousandths of an inch. For example, 2 mils may be
>interpreted as two millimeters or 0.002 inches.
>
>In order to overcome this problem, I propose that we use a new standard.
> You have probably heard the statement that a "measurement was on within
>a gnats ass". In order to understand what this really means, I have
>examined some photographs of gnats and measured what appears to be their
>ass. From these photographs, the average value of the gnats ass came
>about to be 0.002 inches or 0.05 millimeters.
>
>I am therefore proposing an unambiguous measurement amongst RP'ers to be
>GA units (GA is the abbreviation for gnats ass), where a GA is 0.002
>inches or 0.05 millimeters.
>
>What do you think?
>
>Regards,
>Al Hastbacka
>
>For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
>

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:50:52 EEST