So, this is basically old news then.
Would the original post be classified as TROLL in that case?
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Crangle <rcltd@nckcn.com>
To: DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS <DANIEL@proton.com.my>; <panda@banet.net>;
<kevan_jones@cemcom.com>
Cc: 'RP-ML' <rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi>
Sent: Friday, December 11, 1998 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Internet phone charges
>FYI, from my Congressman:
>
>"Thank you for your e-mail regarding charges by telephone companies for
>Internet use. I appreciate your taking the time to contact me on this
>very important issue.
>
>"As you may know, in December 1996, the Federal Communications Commission
>(FCC) requested public comment on issues relating to the charges that
>Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and similar companies pay to local
>telephone companies. On May 7, 1997, the FCC decided to leave the
>existing rate structure in place. At this time, I am not aware of any
>efforts before Congress which would allow telephone companies to impose
>per-minute access charges on consumers for ISP service."
>
>
>----------
>> From: DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS <DANIEL@proton.com.my>
>> To: 'panda@banet.net'; 'kevan_jones@cemcom.com'
>> Cc: 'RP-ML' <rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi>
>> Subject: Re: Internet phone charges
>> Date: Friday, December 11, 1998 1:53 AM.hut.fi/rp-ml/
>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:47:38 EEST