We would also like the same response to anyone out there using the SL 5410
resin. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Lynda Hurley
Engineer/CIM
Lockheed Martin
Rapid Prototyping Lab
Orlando, Florida
(407)356-4390 - phone
(407)940-2148 - pager
(407)356-9235 - Fax
lynda.j.hurley@lmco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lrwhitaker@mmm.com [SMTP:lrwhitaker@mmm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 1998 12:32 PM
> To: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
> Cc: krpinney@mmm.com; mahartfel@mmm.com
> Subject: Ciba 5220 SLA resin
>
> Greetings RP-ML,
>
> We are considering changing from Ciba 5170 to the Ciba 5220 resin in our
> SLA250/40 machine. Before we do, we'd like to get some feed back from
> current users.
>
> Does this resin live up to the claims?
> Are build times significantly faster?
> Does it post cure like the 5170 without becoming gummy?
> Are side wall finishes actually better?
> How well do these parts finish off?
> Do the supports remove easily?
>
>
>
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:46:36 EEST