On Wed, 29 Jan 1997 axiom@vnet.net wrote:
> So how about a standard bench mark part so we could compare apples and apples.
> Something straight forward and of course a standard layer thichness. Any
> recommendations?
Yes, benchmarks are important, and there have been several good
ones, like Chrysler's and IMS's, and it's probably time to have a new
batch done. But the point I was making is that the different systems
CANNOT be compared as apples to apples because they have fundamental
differences. Yeah, it turns out that life really is hard after all.
Best regards,
Marshall Burns
marshall@ennex.com
*************************************************************************
** Ennex(TM) Fabrication Technologies **
** FABRICATING THE FUTURE (TM) **
******* *******
** 10911 Weyburn Avenue, Suite 332, Los Angeles, U.S.A. 90024 **
** Phone: +1 (310) 824-8700 Fax: +1 (310) 824-5185 **
** E-Mail: fabbers@ennex.com **
*************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:39:18 EEST