Re: Feedback on Cubital

From: Gregory Pettengill (Cote Art & Engineering)
To: RP-ML
Date: Friday, February 3, 1995
Subject: Re: Feedback on Cubital
Patrick M. Maley wrote;
>  As a recent new member to this list and to the R.P. industry in general, I
>would like to ask a favor.  Could any or all supply me with some feedback on
>Cubital's technology and perceived fit in the marketplace?

Greg Pettengill wrote;
>  Second, is hybridizing of additive & subtractive methods.  Cubital is one of the
>very few examples that even hints at this possibility.  The goal of automatic part 
>production, will most likely be accomplished by a machine that will perform & use
>both modes to their best advantages.

Patrick M. Maley replied;
>Thank you for your comments about our systems.  I found your perception
>of Cubital's Solider, being both an additive and subtractive process, very
>enlightening.  This is a very inventive, and creative, look at our systems.

You are very welcome, Patrick.
I would like to hear comments and ideas from anyone that is interested in the
"hybridizing of additive & subtractive methods".

Best Regards

  Greg Pettengill